Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Lancet Reg Health Am ; 9: 100197, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1670851

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 second wave in Brazil, there has been a significant increase in the number of daily cases and deaths, including pregnant and postpartum women. We assess risk factors and outcomes for this priority group compared to the COVID-19 non-pregnant cohort in two epidemic waves. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we evaluated data of hospitalized pregnant, postpartum, and nonpregnant women aged 15-44 years, between epidemiological weeks 2020-8 and 2021-15, who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, retrieved from the Influenza Epidemiological Surveillance Information System maintained by Ministry of Health of Brazil. We analysed in-hospital case fatality rate, crude and adjusted risk ratios on different outcomes aiming to compare data in two waves. FINDINGS: The study included pregnant women (n = 7,132), postpartum women (n = 2,405) and nonpregnant women (n = 76,278) hospitalized with COVID-19. Case fatality rates of pregnant women were lower in both waves compared to nonpregnant women, but higher among postpartum women. The risk for admission to the intensive care unit and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement in both waves was significantly higher among postpartum women compared to nonpregnant women. Cardiac disease, diabetes, obesity, and asthma were the most frequent underlying medical conditions in all patient groups. These comorbidities were significantly less frequent among pregnant women. INTERPRETATION: Pregnant women with COVID-19 are at lower risk of poor outcome compared to nonpregnant women. On the other hand, postpartum women are at higher risk of adverse outcomes compared to pregnant and nonpregnant women, especially during the second wave. There was a significant increase in the in-hospital case fatality rate for all patient groups during the second wave of COVID-19. FUNDING: This study was financed in part by CAPES, CNPq, FAPEMIG and UFSJ.

2.
Build Environ ; 207: 108414, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1446479

ABSTRACT

Uncertainty remains on the threshold of ventilation rate in airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. We analyzed a COVID-19 outbreak in January 2020 in Hunan Province, China, involving an infected 24-year-old man, Mr. X, taking two subsequent buses, B1 and B2, in the same afternoon. We investigated the possibility of airborne transmission and the ventilation conditions for its occurrence. The ventilation rates on the buses were measured using a tracer-concentration decay method with the original driver on the original route. We measured and calculated the spread of the exhaled virus-laden droplet tracer from the suspected index case. Ten additional passengers were found to be infected, with seven of them (including one asymptomatic) on B1 and two on B2 when Mr. X was present, and one passenger infected on the subsequent B1 trip. B1 and B2 had time-averaged ventilation rates of approximately 1.7 and 3.2 L/s per person, respectively. The difference in ventilation rates and exposure time could explain why B1 had a higher attack rate than B2. Airborne transmission due to poor ventilation below 3.2 L/s played a role in this two-bus outbreak of COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL